WHAT WE'RE READING
The morning read for Tuesday, Jan. 31
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court.
January 2023 Archive
Every post published in January 2023, most recent first.
Showing 1 - 1054 Results
SCOTUS NEWSMerits Cases
Court schedules final two argument sessions of 2022-23 term
The final argument session of the Supreme Court’s 2022-23 term will include high-profile disputes over how employers must accommodate their employees’ religious practices and how courts should decide whether threatening statements are protected by the First Amendment.
SCOTUSTALKSCOTUStalk
What’s going on with Munsingwear?
In an essay published in The New York Times this fall, two law professors, Lisa Tucker and Stefanie Lindquist, argued that the Supreme Court is increasingly setting aside significant decisions from the lower courts as if they never happened.
WHAT WE'RE READING
The morning read for Monday, Jan. 30
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Monday morning read: Supreme Court did not disclose financial relationship with expert brought in to review leak probe (Joan Biskupic, CNN) What happens if the Supreme Court strikes down student loan forgiveness?
WHAT WE'RE READING
The morning read for Friday, Jan. 27
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com.
petitions of the weekRelist Watch
Arthrex seeks second Supreme Court intervention in patent clash
The Petitions of the Week column highlights a selection of cert petitions recently filed in the Supreme Court. A list of all petitions we’re watching is available here.
WHAT WE'RE READING
The morning read for Thursday, Jan. 26
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com.
No, Ruth Bader Ginsburg did not dissent in Obergefell — and other things ChatGPT gets wrong about the Supreme Court
When ChatGPT, a cutting-edge artificial-intelligence chatbot, launched in November, it captured the attention of the legal community. Some lawyers worried that the program — which can generate eerily human-sounding text in response to complex written prompts — would make them obsolete.
WHAT WE'RE READING
The morning read for Wednesday, Jan. 25
Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com.
SCOTUS FOCUSMerits Cases
A “DIG” on attorney-client privilege: Why the court decided not to decide In re Grand Jury
After the oral argument in In re Grand Jury, the smart money would have predicted either that the court would affirm the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit or dismiss the case as improvidently granted. On Monday, it dismissed.