Today at the Supreme Court: 12/29/06
The Supreme Court is in recess until its Conference on Friday, Jan. 5. No oral arguments are scheduled and no non-capital orders or opinions are expected to be issued today.
Every post published in 2006, most recent first.
The Supreme Court is in recess until its Conference on Friday, Jan. 5. No oral arguments are scheduled and no non-capital orders or opinions are expected to be issued today.
The D.C. Circuit Court on Friday barred a group of retired federal judges from filing a friend-of-court brief supporting war-on-terrorism detainees’ challenge to the new Military Commissions Act of 2006.
This post is part 3 in our discussion with Professor David Stras of the University of Minnesota Law School (part 1 is here, part 2 here). Professor Stras has written extensively on issues surrounding the Supreme Court; in this entry, we discuss his paper advocating a revival of circuit riding for Supreme Court Justices, “Why Supreme Court Justices Should Ride Circuit Again,” which can be found here.
The Supreme Court building will be closed on Tuesday, as part of the presidentially ordered National Day of Mourning for former President Gerald R. Ford, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., announced Friday. The announcement of the closing can be found here.
Further to my previous posts on the state of the Court’s docket, there have been a couple of developments. First, the Court issued the February argument calendar. The calendar includes three days with only a single argument.
The Supreme Court is in recess until its Conference on Friday, Jan. 5. No oral arguments are scheduled and no non-capital orders or opinions are expected to be issued today.
For more than a quarter of a century, the Supreme Court and the courts that review Texas death penalty cases have been carrying on a not-always-cordial exchange over the jury’s role in weighing evidence that defense lawyers offer to try to head off capital punishment in that state.
The Supreme Court is in recess until its Conference on Friday, Jan. 5. No oral arguments are scheduled and no non-capital orders or opinions are expected to be issued today.
This post is part 2 in our discussion with Professor David Stras of the University of Minnesota Law School (part 1 is here). Professor Stras has written extensively on issues surrounding the Supreme Court; in this entry, we discuss his paper about life tenure, “An Empirical Analysis of Life Tenure: A Response to Professors Calabresi & Lindgren,” which can be found here.
Gerald R. Ford’s legacy, now being reassessed in the wake of his death Tuesday night, will be measured many ways. Of course, much is being made of his decision as President to pardon former President Richard M. Nixon for the crimes of the Watergate scandal; historians may well mark that as his most consequential act.