Opinions This Week
The Court will be issuing opinions in one or more argued cases both tomorrow and Wednesday. There’ll be an Order List today.
Every post published in February 2005, most recent first.
The Court will be issuing opinions in one or more argued cases both tomorrow and Wednesday. There’ll be an Order List today.
Here is today’s Order List. The Court granted certiorari in four cases and asked for the SG’s views in another. Still no word on the four petitions challenging the constitutionality of the recess appointment of Judge Pryor.
The Supreme Court on Monday granted review of four cases, one on the free-speech rights of public employees, one on state taxes on gasoline sold by Indian tribes to their customers, and two on jurisdictional issues.
On Sunday The L.A. Times had this editorial piece on Chief Justice Rehnquist’s legacy. UPI’s Michael Kirkland has this article in The Washington Times discussing opinions and oral arguments from last week.
Tuesday, in the consolidated argument of Exxon Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc. and Ortega v. Star-Kist Foods, Inc., the Court will take another swing at deciding whether 28 U.S.C. § 1367 (the supplemental jurisdiction statute) allows a federal court with diversity jurisdiction over a claim exceeding the jurisdictional amount to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over related claims that do not.
This is a followup to the Supreme Court’s rulings on June 28, 2004, in Rumsfeld v. Padilla and Hamdi v. Rumsfeld.
I’m arguing this case tomorrow at the Court. The question is the extent to which Title III of the Americans With Disabilities Act applies to cruise ships, and foreign-flagged cruise ships in particular.
Tom Perrotta has this article in New York Law Journal discussing the Court’s opinions in Blakely and Booker. Ann Woolner has this opinion piece in Bloomberg on Gonzales v. Oregon, in which the Court granted cert. on Tuesday.
As Tom previously noted, we filed a brief in opposition to certiorari today in No. 04-856, City of Evanston v. Franklin.
The Court on Tuesday announced its decision in Smith v. Massachusetts, vacating a state conviction on Double Jeopardy grounds where the judge reversed a midtrial ruling of insufficiency of the evidence on one count.