Skip to content

C. S. v. McCrumb

Pending petition

Docket No. Op. BelowArgument Opinion Vote Author Term
25-831 6th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issue: Whether post hoc speculation about emotional harm that speech could cause to other students is insufficient to meet Tinker’s “substantial disruption” standard.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
10/27/2025Application (25A524) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 10, 2025 to January 9, 2026, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
11/07/2025Application (25A524) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until January 9, 2026.
01/09/2026Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 12, 2026)
02/16/2026Waiver of Craig McCrumb, et al. not accepted for filing. (February 24, 2026)
02/24/2026Waiver of right of respondent Craig McCrumb, et al. to respond filed.
02/25/2026DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/20/2026.
03/03/2026Response Requested. (Due April 2, 2026)
03/05/2026Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 2, 2026 to May 2, 2026, submitted to The Clerk.
03/06/2026Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 4, 2026. See Rule 30.1.