Skip to content
Newsletter

SCOTUStoday for Monday, March 9

Carved details along top of Supreme Court building are pictured
(Katie Barlow)

Just 22% of U.S. registered voters have “a great deal” (7%) or “quite a bit” (15%) of confidence in the Supreme Court, according to a new NBC News poll shared on social media. Voters were more likely to say they had “some” (40%) or “very little” (28%) confidence in the institution.

At the Court

On Friday, the justices met in a private conference to discuss cases and vote on petitions for review. Orders from that conference are expected this morning at 9:30 a.m. EDT.

The court will next hear arguments on Monday, March 23, the first day of its March sitting.

Morning Reads

Trump chides Supreme Court, says it hasn’t had ‘guts to do what’s right’

Sophie Brams, The Hill

During a Friday roundtable at the White House, President Donald Trump again criticized the Supreme Court, “voicing deep frustration with ‘a number’ of recent decisions that have included the rejection of his signature tariff policy and his attempts to federalize the National Guard,” according to The Hill. “I think the Supreme Court ought to be ashamed of itself for a lot of reasons, ok?,” the president said. “I got to live with these people. And I say this … and they’ll only vote bad, and I couldn’t care less at this point. They have hurt this country so badly because they haven’t had the guts to do what’s right.”

Customs and Border Protection official says new process for tariff refunds could be ready in 45 days

Mae Anderson, Associated Press

In a Friday filing with the U.S. Court of International Trade, Brandon Lord, executive director of U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s trade policy and programs directorate, explained that “the CBP is working on a new system [for tariff refunds] that will simplify the process. He said it should be ready in 45 days and require ‘minimal submission from importers,’” according to the Associated Press. “The filing comes after a judge on Wednesday ordered the government to start paying back all importers the illegal tariffs they paid – with interest.”

Trump cannot end protections for 350,000 Haitians, US appeals court rules

Nate Raymond, Reuters

On Friday, a 2-1 panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit “refused to let the Trump administration revoke legal protections that allow more than 350,000 Haitians to live and work in the U.S.,” according to Reuters. “The administration [had] noted that the U.S. Supreme Court had twice allowed it to end [Temporary Protected Status] for Venezuelans. But U.S. Circuit Judges Florence Pan and Brad Garcia, both appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden, distinguished the cases and said Haitians sent home would ‘be vulnerable to violence amid a “collapsing rule of law” and lack access to life-sustaining medical care.’” In dissent, U.S. Circuit Judge Justin Walker, who was appointed by Trump, said “the case and the earlier Supreme Court litigation involving Venezuelans were ‘the legal equivalent of fraternal, if not identical, twins.’”

D.C. Court Strikes Down Local Ban on High-Capacity Gun Magazines

Mattathias Schwartz, The New York Times

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals on Thursday struck down Washington, D.C.’s ban on “gun magazines that contain more than 10 bullets,” holding that it is unconstitutional because “large-capacity magazines ‘are arms in common and ubiquitous use’” and there is a “lack of ‘history or tradition’ of any blanket prohibition on them,” according to The New York Times. “The District of Columbia could appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court, or ask that a larger panel from the local appeals court reconsider it.”

Why America needs evangelicals on the Supreme Court — and more

Aaron M. Renn, The Washington Post

In a column for The Washington Post, Aaron M. Renn advocated for “[a] stronger evangelical presence in elite institutions,” including the Supreme Court, explaining his belief that such presence “could strengthen” these institutions “while addressing polarization and public mistrust.” “Evangelicals are 23 percent of U.S. adults and one of the most loyal Republican voting blocs, with 81 percent backing Donald Trump in 2024. Yet despite six of the nine Supreme Court justices being appointed by Republican presidents, there are no evangelicals on the Supreme Court,” Renn wrote.

On Site

From the SCOTUSblog Team

Will the mystery of the Dobbs leak ever be solved?

The leak in May 2022 of a draft of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization has been back in the news lately. Here’s a refresher on the circumstances of the leak and a look at what might happen next.

protests after politico
Argument Analysis

Justices poised to adopt exceptions to federal criminal defendants’ appellate waivers

The Supreme Court heard oral argument on Tuesday about what exceptions exist to federal defendants’ waivers of their right to appeal. The justices seemed poised to endorse more exceptions than just the two the government endorsed – ones for ineffective assistance of counsel in entering into a plea agreement and for sentences above the statutory maximum.

The Supreme Court of the United States building is seen in Washington D.C., on Dec. 2, 2024
Contributor Corner

The emergency docket’s critics have it backwards

In her Ratio Decidendi column, Stephanie Barclay pushed back against the claims that, in two recent interim docket orders, “the court bypassed necessary procedural steps in a rush to reach preferred results.” “What is called judicial aggression at One First Street,” Barclay contended, “is often just a response to judicial aggression one floor down – the correction, not the disruption.”

The statue, Authority of Law, by American sculptor James Earle Fraser outside the Supreme Court of the United States. The High Court building was built during the Great Depression and completed in 1935. Architect Cass Gilbert's design is based on a Greco-Roman temple.
Contributor Corner

Birthright citizenship: the exceptions provide the rule

In a column for SCOTUSblog, Samarth Desai explored the meaning of the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” in the 14th Amendment, reflecting on who it excludes and why he rejects the Trump administration’s view that “a child is a birthright citizen only if at least one parent’s domicile, or legal home base, is in America.”

The United States Capitol building is seen in Washington D.C., United States, on December 9, 2025
Interim Docket Blog

Supreme Court Stays to State Courts

In his latest Interim Docket Blog post, William Baude addressed the Supreme Court’s recent interim order staying a New York trial court decision, analyzing the circumstances under which the Supreme Court has jurisdiction in disputes working their way through state courts.

SCOTUS Quote

JUSTICE SCALIA: “Right, you’re relying on the principle that life is not fair, right?”

MR. BROCKMAN: “Life is not fair. Maryland taxes are.”

Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. Wynne

Recommended Citation: Kelsey Dallas and Nora Collins, SCOTUStoday for Monday, March 9, SCOTUSblog (Mar. 9, 2026, 9:00 AM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/03/scotustoday-for-monday-march-9/