Invenergy Thermal LLC v. Sixkiller
Petition for certiorari denied on October 6, 2025
Issues: (1) Whether the court’s decision in General Motors Corp. v. Tracy immunizes state laws affecting utilities from challenge under the dormant commerce clause, even when those laws affect competitive markets; and (2) whether alleging interstate and market-wide consequences of a state law, including a protectionist effect, adequately alleges a burden on interstate commerce.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 03/24/2025 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 25, 2025) |
| 04/18/2025 | Waiver of right of respondent Casey Sixkiller to respond filed. |
| 04/23/2025 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2025. |
| 04/30/2025 | Response Requested. (Due May 30, 2025) |
| 05/20/2025 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 30, 2025 to June 30, 2025, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 05/21/2025 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 30, 2025. |
| 06/30/2025 | Brief of respondent Casey Sixkiller in opposition filed. |
| 07/16/2025 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025. |
| 07/16/2025 | Reply of petitioners Invenergy Thermal LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| 10/06/2025 | Petition DENIED. |