Noem v. Perdomo
Application for stay of district court order granted on Sept. 8, 2025. Justice Sotomayor wrote a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson.
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25a169 | 9th Cir. | Not Argued | Sep 8, 2025 | TBD | N/A | OT 2025 |
Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should stay a district court order preventing federal immigration officers from relying on any combination of four factors – “apparent race or ethnicity,” speaking in Spanish or accented English, presence at a location where undocumented immigrants “are known to gather,” and working at specific jobs, such as landscaping or construction – to justify conducting detentive stops in seven southern California counties, including Los Angeles.
Judgment: Application for stay is granted on September 8, 2025. Justice Kavanaugh filed a concurring opinion. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Kagan and Jackson.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- The strange case of the superfluous sentence (Jeffrey Kahn and Stephen Wermiel, September 25, 2025)
- Justice Brett Kavanaugh and racial proxies (César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, September 23, 2025)
- “Roving patrols,” reasonable suspicion, and Perdomo (Rory Little, September 18, 2025)
- Supreme Court allows federal officers to more freely make immigration stops in LA (Amy Howe, September 8, 2025)
- The Trump administration puts ethnicity on the court’s emergency docket (César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, August 19, 2025)
- Groups ask Supreme Court to keep in place district court ruling barring immigration stops (Amy Howe, August 12, 2025)
- Trump administration urges Supreme Court to block district court ruling preventing immigration stops (Amy Howe, August 7, 2025)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
08/07/2025 | Application (25A169) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
08/08/2025 | Response to application (25A169) requested by Justice Kagan, due by 5 p.m. (EDT) on August 12, 2025. |
08/12/2025 | Response to application from respondent Pedro Vasquez Perdomo, et al. filed. |
08/12/2025 | Brief amici curiae of Los Angeles, California, et al. filed. |
08/13/2025 | Reply of applicant Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al. filed. |
08/22/2025 | Brief amicus curiae of Federation for American Immigration Reform filed. |
09/08/2025 | Application (25A169) referred to the Court. |
09/08/2025 | Application (25A169) for stay presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to the Court is granted. The July 11, 2025 order entered by the United States District Court for the Central District of California, case No. 2:25-cv-5605, is stayed pending the disposition of the appeal in the Ninth Circuit and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, if such a writ is timely sought. Should certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court. Justice Kavanaugh, concurs (Detached Opinion). Justice Sotomayor, joined by Justice Kagan and Justice Jackson, dissent. (Detached Opinion) |