Noem v. Doe
Emergency application for stay is granted on May 30, 2025. Justice Jackson filed a dissent, in which Justice Sotomayor joined.
Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should stay the district court's order holding that the Secretary of Homeland Security lacked authority to revoke the categorical grant of parole to 532,000 non-citizens from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela, without providing individualized, case-by-case consideration for each person.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Supreme Court allows DHS to end parole for a half-million noncitizens (Amy Howe, May 30, 2025)
- Government asks justices to allow DHS to revoke parole for a half-million noncitizens (Amy Howe, May 8, 2025)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 05/08/2025 | Application (24A1079) for a stay, submitted to Justice Jackson. |
| 05/08/2025 | Response to application (24A1079) requested by Justice Jackson, due by 4 p.m. (EDT), on May 15, 2025. |
| 05/13/2025 | Brief amicus curiae of Immigration Reform Law Institute filed. |
| 05/15/2025 | Brief amici curiae of Faith-Based Organizations filed. |
| 05/15/2025 | Brief amici curiae of America's Future, et al. filed. |
| 05/15/2025 | Response to application from respondent Svitlana Doe, et al. filed. |
| 05/16/2025 | Reply of applicant Kristi Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al. filed. |
| 05/16/2025 | Brief amicus curiae of Cities, Counties, and Local Government Leaders filed. |
| 05/16/2025 | Brief amicus curiae of CATO Institute, et al. filed. |
| 05/16/2025 | Brief amicus curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) filed. |
| 05/30/2025 | Application (24A1079) referred to the Court. |
| 05/30/2025 | Application (24A1079) for stay presented to Justice Jackson and by her referred to the Court is granted. The April 15,2025 order entered by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts, case No. 1:25–cv–10495, is stayed pending the disposition of the appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari, if such a writ is timely sought. Should certiorari be denied, this stay shall terminate automatically. In the event certiorari is granted, the stay shall terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this Court. Justice Jackson, with whom Justice Sotomayor joins, dissenting from the grant of the application for a stay. (Detached Opinion) |