Skip to content

Juliana v. United States

Petition for certiorari denied on March 24, 2025

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
24-645 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2024

Issue: (1) Whether, when plaintiffs have established their ongoing injuries are traceable to defendants" policies and practices, Article III of the Constitution requires a particularized factual determination of whether a federal agency or official will redress plaintiffs" injuries following a favorable declaratory judgment that resolves the constitutional controversy; and (2) whether exceptions exist to the three demanding conditions for mandamus articulated in Cheney v. U.S. District Court for District of Columbia.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
09/12/2024Application (24A267) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 10, 2024 to December 9, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
09/16/2024Application (24A267) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until December 9, 2024.
12/09/2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 13, 2025)
01/07/2025Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 13, 2025 to February 12, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.
01/08/2025Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 12, 2025.
01/13/2025Brief amici curiae of Public Justice, et al. filed.
01/13/2025Brief amici curiae of Members of Congress filed.
02/12/2025Brief of respondents United States, et al. in opposition filed.
02/26/2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/21/2025.
02/26/2025Reply of petitioners Kelsey Cascadia Rose Juliana, et al. filed. (Distributed)
03/24/2025Petition DENIED.