Nutramax Laboratories, Inc. v. Lytle
Petition for certiorari denied on March 3, 2025
Issue: Whether, when a plaintiff seeking to certify a class relies on an expert to establish that classwide issues predominate, the expert testimony must satisfy the requirements for admissibility.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Maine man arrested with drugs in his backpack asks court to untangle Fourth Amendment knot (Kalvis Golde, February 26, 2025)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 11/21/2024 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 26, 2024) |
| 12/05/2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 26, 2024 to January 27, 2025, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 12/06/2024 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 27, 2025. |
| 12/20/2024 | Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed. |
| 01/27/2025 | Brief of respondents Justin Lytle, et al. in opposition filed. |
| 02/11/2025 | Reply of petitioners Nutramax Laboratories, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| 02/12/2025 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2025. |
| 03/03/2025 | Petition DENIED. |