Skip to content

Nettles v. Midland Funding, LLC

Petition for certiorari denied on October 4, 2021

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
20-1673 7th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2021

Issue: (1) Whether, under Spokeo, it is sufficient for standing simply to allege a violation of the procedural rights created by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, as six circuits have held, or must a plaintiff also always allege an additional injury beyond such a violation, as five circuits (including the 7th in this case) have held; and (2) whether some additional injury is required for standing under the Act, whether it is sufficient to allege mental distress or lost time dealing with a violation of the Act, as the 4th, 11th, and D.C. Circuits have held, or whether something more than mental distress or lost time is required, as the 7th (in this case) and 9th Circuits have held.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
05/20/2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 2, 2021)
06/29/2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 2, 2021 to August 2, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
06/30/2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 2, 2021.
08/02/2021Brief of respondents Midland Funding LLC, et al. in opposition filed.
08/18/2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
08/18/2021Reply of petitioner Ashley Nettles filed. (Distributed)
10/04/2021Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.