Banegas-Gomez v. Barr
Petition for certiorari denied on January 27, 2020
Linked with:
Issue: Whether the government may commence removal proceedings by issuing a notice to appear that omits the proceedings' time and place.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the week (Andrew Hamm, December 5, 2019)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 10/16/2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 20, 2019) |
| 10/16/2019 | Pursuant to Rule 34.6 and Paragraph 9 of the Guidelines for the Submission of Documents to the Supreme Court's Electronic Filing System, filings in this case should be submitted in paper form only, and should not be submitted through the Court's electronic filing system. |
| 11/14/2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 20, 2019 to December 20, 2019, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 11/15/2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 20, 2019. |
| 12/20/2019 | Brief of respondent William P. Barr, Attorney General in opposition filed. |
| 01/07/2020 | Reply of petitioner Jose Javier Banegas Gomez filed. |
| 01/08/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/24/2020. |
| 01/27/2020 | Petition DENIED. |