C.D. v. Natick Public School District
Petition for certiorari denied on March 2, 2020
Issue: Whether a school district"s decision to educate a child with disabilities outside the regular classroom violates the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act"s mainstreaming mandate.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the week (Andrew Hamm, September 20, 2019)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 08/20/2019 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 20, 2019) |
| 08/26/2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 20, 2019 to December 6, 2019, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 08/28/2019 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 6, 2019, for all respondents. |
| 11/15/2019 | Waiver of right of respondent Masssachusetts Bureau of Special Education Appeals to respond filed. |
| 12/06/2019 | Brief of respondent Natick Public Schools in opposition filed. |
| 12/20/2019 | Reply of petitioners C.D., by and through her parents and next friends, M.D. and P.D., et al. filed. (Distributed) |
| 12/23/2019 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020. |
| 12/31/2019 | Response Requested. (Due January 30, 2020) |
| 01/29/2020 | Brief of Masssachusetts Bureau of Special Education Appeals in opposition not accepted for filing. (February 05, 2020 - Document does not comply with Rule 33) |
| 01/29/2020 | Letter dated February 7, 2020 from counsel for respondent Masssachusetts Bureau of Special Education Appeals in opposition filed. (Letter replaces brief in opposition not accepted for filing February 5, 2020) |
| 02/12/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2020. |
| 03/02/2020 | Petition DENIED. |