Midland Funding, LLC v. Johnson
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
16-348 | 11th Cir. | Jan 17, 2017 | May 15, 2017 | 5-3 | Breyer | OT 2016 |
Holding: The filing of a proof of claim that is obviously time barred is not a false, deceptive, misleading, unfair or unconscionable debt-collection practice within the meaning of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
Judgment: Reversed, 5-3, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on May 15, 2017. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Ginsburg and Kagan joined. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Opinion analysis: Justices approve filing stale claims in consumer bankruptcies (Ronald Mann, May 16, 2017)
- Argument analysis: Justices appear divided over treatment of stale claims in consumer bankruptcies (Ronald Mann, January 18, 2017)
- Argument preview: Justices to consider stale claims in consumer bankruptcies (Ronald Mann, January 10, 2017)
- Court adds three hours of oral argument to its merits docket (Amy Howe, October 11, 2016)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
09/16/2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 17, 2016) |
09/19/2016 | Brief of respondent Aleida Johnson filed. |
09/20/2016 | Letter of September 20, 2016, from counsel for petitioner received waiving the 14-day waiting period for the distribution of the petition pursuant to Rule 15.5. |
09/21/2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 7, 2016. |
09/21/2016 | Reply of petitioner Midland Funding, LLC filed. (Distributed) |
10/11/2016 | Petition GRANTED. |
11/01/2016 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for petitioner. |
11/04/2016 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondent. |
11/14/2016 | Brief of petitioner Midland Funding, LLC filed. |
11/14/2016 | Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.) |
11/18/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of DBA International, Inc. filed. |
11/21/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed. |
11/21/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of Resurgent Capital Services, L.P. filed. |
11/21/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of ACA International filed. |
11/21/2016 | Brief amici curiae of NARCA - National Creditors Bar Association, et al. filed. |
12/05/2016 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, January 17, 2017. |
12/07/2016 | Record requested from U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit. |
12/09/2016 | Record received from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit. The record is electronic and available on PACER. |
12/12/2016 | CIRCULATED. |
12/14/2016 | Brief of respondent Aleida Johnson (Reprinted) filed. (Distributed) |
12/21/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed) |
12/21/2016 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed. |
12/21/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Chapter Thirteen Trustees filed. (Distributed) |
12/21/2016 | Brief amicus curiae of G. Eric Brunstad, Jr. filed. (Distributed) |
12/21/2016 | Brief amici curiae of National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
12/21/2016 | Brief amici curiae of Public Citizen, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed) |
01/06/2017 | Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED. |
01/06/2017 | Reply of petitioner Midland Funding, LLC filed. (Distributed) |
01/17/2017 | Argued. For petitioner: Kannon K. Shanmugam, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Daniel L. Geyser, Dallas, Tex.; and Sarah E. Harrington, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) |
05/15/2017 | Judgment REVERSED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Kennedy, Thomas, and Alito, JJ., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg and Kagan, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
06/19/2017 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |