Hexom v. Minnesota
Petition granted, judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Birchfield v. North Dakota on June 28, 2016
Issue: Whether the State may evade the Fourth Amendment warrant requirement by coercing submission to chemical testing by promising criminal prosecution for refusal, and then deeming that coerced submission to be the legal equivalent of free and voluntary consent to search.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 02/16/2016 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 21, 2016) |
| 03/08/2016 | Waiver of right of respondent Minnesota to respond filed. |
| 03/23/2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 15, 2016. |
| 03/29/2016 | Response Requested . (Due April 28, 2016) |
| 04/22/2016 | Brief of respondent Minnesota in opposition filed. |
| 05/10/2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 26, 2016. |
| 06/27/2016 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 27, 2016. |
| 06/28/2016 | Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Birchfield v. North Dakota, 579 U. S. ____ (2016). |
| 08/01/2016 | MANDATE ISSUED |
| 08/01/2016 | JUDGMENT ISSUED |