Chapman v. Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLC
Petition for certiorari denied on May 18, 2015
Issue: Whether Federal Rule of Evidence 702, as interpreted by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals and its progeny, permits a district court to require epidemiological evidence as a precondition for admissibility of a qualified expert's opinion that a toxic substance is capable of causing a particular disease.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Maureen Johnston, April 22, 2015)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
11/26/2014 | Application (14A563) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 10, 2014 to February 6, 2015, submitted to Justice Thomas. |
12/03/2014 | Application (14A563) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until February 6, 2015. |
02/06/2015 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 11, 2015) |
03/06/2015 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including April 10, 2015. |
04/10/2015 | Brief of respondents Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLC, et al. in opposition filed. |
04/28/2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 14, 2015. |
04/28/2015 | Reply of petitioners Marianne Chapman and Daniel Chapman filed. (Distributed) |
05/18/2015 | Petition DENIED. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. |