Becton, Dickinson and Company v. Retractable Technologies, Inc.
Petition for certiorari denied on April 20, 2015
Issue: (1) Whether, when a jury uses a general verdict form to award damages, and at least one but not all of the claims submitted to the jury is set aside on appeal, further proceedings to recalculate damages are required under the general verdict rule; and (2) whether, to benefit from the general verdict rule following a partial reversal on appeal, a litigant must object to the general verdict form and invoke the general verdict rule in advance of a partial reversal (as four courts of appeal have held), or whether these steps are unnecessary (as five courts of appeals have held).
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Maureen Johnston, March 18, 2015)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
12/03/2014 | Application (14A584) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 18, 2014 to January 16, 2015, submitted to The Chief Justice. |
12/04/2014 | Application (14A584) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 16, 2015. |
01/16/2015 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 19, 2015) |
01/23/2015 | Waiver of right of respondents Retractable Technologies, Inc., et al. to respond filed. |
02/04/2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 20, 2015. |
02/10/2015 | Response Requested . (Due March 12, 2015) |
03/12/2015 | Brief of respondents Retractable Technologies, Inc., and Thomas Shaw in opposition filed. |
03/27/2015 | Reply of petitioner Becton, Dickinson and Company filed. |
04/01/2015 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 17, 2015. |
04/20/2015 | Petition DENIED. |