Skip to content

Amgen Inc. v. Harris

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
13-888 9th Cir. Not Argued Jun 30, 2014 TBD TBD OT 2013

Issue: (1) Whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that respondents, in seeking to prove their claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), could invoke the presumption of class-wide reliance approved by this Court for securities claims in Basic Inc. v. Levinson; (2) whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that a fiduciary of a company"s employee-retirement plan must act -- with respect to publicly-traded securities -- on non-public information about the company in order to avoid liability under ERISA; and (3) whether the Ninth Circuit erred in holding that the "presumption of prudence," which protects ERISA fiduciaries from liability in certain circumstances, applies only if the relevant retirement-plan language requires or encourages a fiduciary to invest in the employer"s own stock.

Judgment: Vacated and remanded on June 30, 2014.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
01/10/2014Application (13A729) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 21, 2014 to February 3, 2014, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
01/21/2014Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 24, 2014)
01/24/2014Application (13A729) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until February 3, 2014.
02/14/2014Order extending time to file response to petition to and including March 26, 2014.
03/26/2014Brief of respondents Steve Harris, et al. in opposition filed.
04/08/2014Reply of petitioners Amgen Inc., et al. filed.
04/09/2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 25, 2014.
06/23/2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 26, 2014.
06/23/2014Supplemental brief of petitioners Amgen Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)
06/25/2014Supplemental brief of petitioners filed. (Second Supplement) (Distributed)
06/26/2014Supplemental brief of respondent Steve Harris, et al. filed. (Distributed)
06/30/2014Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, 573 U. S. ___ (2014).
08/01/2014JUDGMENT ISSUED.