Skip to content

Ray Haluch Gravel Co. v. Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
12-992 1st Cir. Dec 9, 2013 Jan 15, 2014 9-0 Kennedy OT 2013

Holding: A decision on the merits is a "final decision" even if the award or amount of attorney's fees remains to be determined.

Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy on January 15, 2014.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
11/30/2012Application (12A551) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 11, 2012 to February 8, 2013, submitted to Justice Breyer.
12/03/2012Application (12A551) granted by Justice Breyer extending the time to file until February 8, 2013.
02/08/2013Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 14, 2013)
02/21/2013Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 13, 2013.
05/13/2013Brief of respondents Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers, et al. in opposition filed.
05/24/2013Reply of petitioner Ray Haluch Gravel Company, et al. filed.
05/28/2013DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 13, 2013.
06/17/2013Petition GRANTED.
07/11/2013The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 28, 2013.
07/11/2013The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including October 23, 2013.
08/27/2013Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)
08/27/2013Brief of petitioners Ray Haluch Gravel Company, et al. filed.
09/17/2013SET FOR ARGUMENT ON Monday December 9, 2013
09/17/2013CIRCULATED
10/02/2013Record from U.S.C.A. for 1st Circuit is electronic and is available on PACER.
10/03/2013Record from U.S.D.C. for District of Massachusetts is electronic and is availabe on PACER.
10/23/2013Brief of respondents Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers and Participating Employers, et al. filed. (Distributed)
11/22/2013Reply of petitioners Ray Haluch Gravel Company, et al. filed. (Distributed)
12/09/2013Argued. For petitioners: Dan Himmelfarb, Washington, D. C. For respondents: James A. Feldman, Washington, D. C.
01/15/2014Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Kennedy, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.
02/18/2014JUDGMENT ISSUED.

Issue: Whether a district court”s decision on the merits that leaves unresolved a request for contractual attorney”s fees is a “final decision” under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, which provides that courts of appeals have jurisdiction of appeals from final decisions of the district courts.