Skip to content
Newsletter

SCOTUStoday for Friday, March 6

Carved details along top of Supreme Court building are pictured
(Katie Barlow)

On this day in 1857, the Supreme Court released its opinion in Dred Scott v. Sandford, holding that Scott, an enslaved man who spent time in free territory, was not free; African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not and could not be citizens; and the Missouri Compromise – which banned slavery in certain territories – was unconstitutional. Chief Justice John Roberts once said that the decision “injured the court for generations.”

Week in Review

The court heard three arguments this week, as it wrapped up its February sitting. Here are the links to SCOTUSblog’s coverage:

And on Wednesday, the court released opinions in two argued cases: Urias-Orellana v. Bondi and Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corporation.

  • In Urias-Orellana, the court unanimously held that the Immigration and Nationality Act requires federal courts of appeals to apply the substantial-evidence standard when they review a determination that asylum seekers’ experiences in their home country did not rise to the level of persecution. Kelsey analyzed the opinion.
  • In Galette, the court unanimously held that New Jersey Transit Corporation is not an arm of the state of New Jersey and thus is not entitled to share in New Jersey’s interstate sovereign immunity from suit. Amy analyzed the opinion.

At the Court

Lawyers for a group of Syrian nationals urged the Supreme Court on Thursday to leave in place a ruling by a federal judge in New York City that allows them to reside in the United States despite efforts by the Trump administration to end their status to do so. For more on the filing, see the On Site section below.

Today, the justices will meet in a private conference to discuss cases and vote on petitions for review. Orders from that conference are expected on Monday at 9:30 a.m. EDT.

Morning Reads

More than 20 states sue over new global tariffs Trump imposed after his stinging Supreme Court loss

Lindsay Whitehurst and Paul Wiseman, Associated Press

The Trump administration’s effort to reimpose tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court has prompted a new lawsuit. On Thursday, “[s]ome two dozen states challenged” the administration’s “planned 15% tariffs on much of the world,” contending that Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 does not give the president the authority to impose “sweeping import taxes,” according to the Associated Press. The states argue that Section 122 “was intended to be used only in specific, limited circumstances” – to address what Section 122 describes as “fundamental international payments problems” related to the U.S. dollar’s relationship to gold. “But the dollar is no longer linked to gold, so critics say Section 122 is obsolete.” Many of the states involved in the new lawsuit were also involved in the successful challenge to Trump’s previous tariffs.

The Tiny Court at the Center of a Massive Scramble to Get Tariff Money Back

Lydia Wheeler and Louise Radnofsky, The Wall Street Journal

Ongoing battles over tariff refunds have given “[o]ne of the most obscure courts in America … a rare moment in the sun.” “Most lawyers know little, if anything, about the Court of International Trade. Fewer than 300 cases were filed there annually in 2023 and 2024,” according to The Wall Street Journal. “The court generally referees disputes over how imported goods are classified and whether they are being dumped into the U.S. at below fair-market value. Until recently, hot cases at the court focused on issues such as Amazon’s contention that video doorbell cameras should be classified as digital still-image video cameras rather than transmission devices.” But now, “there are more than 2,000 lawsuits on the trade court’s doorstep from businesses suing to recoup what they paid” in tariffs.

Trump's TikTok deal benefited firms that 'personally enriched' him, lawsuit says

Ryan J. Reilly, NBC News

A new lawsuit against President Donald Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi argues that the deal to sell TikTok’s U.S. operation “violates a law intended to prevent the spread of Chinese government propaganda and has enriched Trump’s allies,” according to NBC News. The law in question, which was “signed by then-President Joe Biden in 2024” and upheld by the Supreme Court in January 2025, “said that TikTok couldn’t be distributed in the United States unless the Chinese company ByteDance found an American-based corporate home by the day before Donald Trump returned to office.” The Trump administration chose not to enforce the law as it worked on the deal that the president ultimately approved, which included investors from Oracle, MGX, and other companies who “have close ties to the President, and have at times personally enriched him.” In the lawsuit, “two software engineers from California … say they suffered financially due to the non-enforcement of the law.”

Justice Dept., Under Pressure From Trump, Fails to Build Autopen Case Against Biden

Michael S. Schmidt, Devlin Barrett, and Alan Feuer, The New York Times

After scrutinizing whether former President Joe “Biden and his aides broke the law in using the autopen to sign presidential documents,” Trump’s Justice Department determined it “was ultimately unable to move forward with making a case,” according to The New York Times. Three unnamed people who were “briefed on the matter” told the Times that “[i]nvestigators were never quite clear what crime, if any, had been committed by the Biden administration’s use of the autopen.” And it “was also unclear whether investigators should focus their attention on the actions of Mr. Biden’s aides or on Mr. Biden himself, given that the United States Supreme Court, in a landmark ruling in 2024, granted broad immunity to presidents for most acts undertaken as part of their official duties.”

Man pleads guilty to bringing explosives to a DC church marking the start of a Supreme Court term

Michael Kunzelman, Associated Press

Louis Geri of Vineland, New Jersey, “pleaded guilty Thursday to charges that he brought dozens of homemade explosive devices to a Washington, D.C., church that was preparing for an annual Mass celebrating the start of the Supreme Court’s term,” the Associated Press reported, citing court records. “Geri was arrested Oct. 5 outside St. Matthew’s Cathedral, where police officers were clearing the area before the annual Red Mass. Some justices usually attend the celebration, but none went to last year’s ceremony.” Geri is expected to be sentenced in July. “Geri and the government agreed that a prison term ranging from five years and 10 months to seven years and three months would be appropriate.”

On Site

Interim Docket

Syrian nationals urge Supreme Court to keep ruling in place allowing them to stay in the United States

On Thursday, a group of Syrian nationals challenging the Trump administration’s effort to end their eligibility for the Temporary Protected Status program urged the Supreme Court to leave in place a lower-court ruling that allows them to retain their legal status while litigation continues.

The statue, Authority of Law, by American sculptor James Earle Fraser outside the Supreme Court of the United States. The High Court building was built during the Great Depression and completed in 1935. Architect Cass Gilbert's design is based on a Greco-Roman temple.
Opinion Analysis

Supreme Court rules that New Jersey Transit can be sued in other states

The court on Wednesday ruled that two men who were seriously injured in New York and Pennsylvania by buses operated by New Jersey Transit can sue the transit agency in those states. In a unanimous opinion by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, the justices held that New Jersey Transit is not an extension of the state of New Jersey and therefore does not share the state’s immunity from lawsuits.

The U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, D.C.
Argument Analysis

Court grapples with whether federal law supersedes negligent hiring claims against freight brokers

The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard argument on whether federal law prevents state law claims allowing brokers to be held liable for negligently selecting motor carriers or drivers.

The US Supreme Court is seen on the first day of a new term in Washington, D.C., on October 7, 2024.

Podcasts

Advisory Opinions

Can Marijuana Users Be Barred from Owning Guns?

Sarah Isgur and David French break down United States v. Hemani, a Second Amendment case involving an alleged user of a controlled substance in possession of a gun. They then discuss two recent interim docket decisions.

SCOTUS Quote

MS. BLATT: “I’m just trying to get Justice Alito’s vote, and what I’m trying to say –”

(Laughter.)

MS. BLATT: “ – to Justice Alito is – I care about the rest of you too, but – ”

JUSTICE ALITO: “Thank you very much.”

(Laughter.)

JUSTICE ALITO: “It’s very – very few advocates have that –”

JUSTICE GORSUCH: “I’ll just stop then.”

(Laughter.)

JUSTICE ALITO: “– goal.”

Hunter v. United States

Recommended Citation: Kelsey Dallas and Nora Collins, SCOTUStoday for Friday, March 6, SCOTUSblog (Mar. 6, 2026, 9:00 AM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/03/scotustoday-for-friday-march-6/