Monday round-up

At BuzzFeed News, Chris Geidner and Jason Leopold report that “[i]n the midst of a growing fight over what documents senators will see from Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s five years in the George W. Bush White House, a narrow glance into three months of Kavanaugh’s communications with just one office at the Justice Department shows that he worked on key questions involving the president’s power to keep documents from Congress and the public, as well as important legislation in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attacks.” For The Washington Post, Seung Min Kim reports that “Senate Democrats will begin meeting with Supreme Court nominee Brett M. Kavanaugh to press him privately on releasing his papers, … after Democrats had boycotted these sit-downs for weeks amid a document dispute with Republicans.” At Jost on Justice, Kenneth Jost asserts that “the Republicans’ prime movers on judicial confirmations — Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Judiciary Committee Chairman Charles Grassley — are adopting tactics that flatly contradict their stances on President Obama’s last two Supreme Court nominations.”

For The New York Times, Michael Shear and Adam Liptak take a close look at Kavanaugh’s experience working on independent counsel Kenneth Starr’s investigation of President Bill Clinton, “an immersion course in the brutal ways of Washington combat.” For the Los Angeles Times, David Savage writes that “[b]ased on his experience later, including serving as the staff secretary to President George W. Bush, Kavanaugh said he came to believe these investigations distracted the president and damaged the country,” and that he has since argued that  “even an investigation or questioning of a president should not be permitted, unless done by Congress.” In an op-ed for the Louisville Courier-Journal, Justin Walker maintains that “Kavanaugh believes a judge must stand up to the president when the executive branch is in violation of the law.”

At the Associated Press, Geoff Mulvihill reports that environmentalists are worried about Kavanaugh’s “record of slapping back Environmental Protection Agency regulations during his 12 years as a federal appeals court judge.” In an op-ed for Fox News, John Yoo and Robert Delahunty contend that the claim by “Senate Democrats … that [Kavanaugh] will destroy affordable health care” “is not supported by records from his many years of government service.”

Briefly:

We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up.  If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, podcast, or op-ed relating to the Supreme Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. Thank you!

Posted in: Round-up

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY