The petitions of the day are:

Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman
15-1391
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief by the Retail Litigation Center, et al., in support of the petitioners in this case.

Issue(s): Whether state no-surcharge laws unconstitutionally restrict speech conveying price information (as the Eleventh Circuit has held), or regulate economic conduct (as the Second and Fifth Circuits have held).

Rowell v. Pettijohn
15-1455

Issue(s): Whether state no-surcharge laws unconstitutionally restrict speech conveying price information (as the Eleventh Circuit has held), or regulate only economic conduct (as the Second and Fifth Circuits have held).

Bondi v. Dana’s Railroad Supply
15-1482

Issue(s): Whether Florida's nearly thirty-year-old Surcharge Statute is a facially unconstitutional speech restriction, as the Eleventh Circuit held, or whether such a law regulates only conduct and does not even implicate the First Amendment, as the Second and Fifth Circuits have held.

Posted in Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman, Rowell v. Pettijohn, Bondi v. Dana’s Railroad Supply, Cases in the Pipeline

Recommended Citation: Kate Howard, Petitions of the day, SCOTUSblog (Jul. 1, 2016, 11:14 PM), https://www.scotusblog.com/2016/07/petitions-of-the-day-27/