Thursday round-up

As Lyle Denniston reported for this blog, by a vote of five to four, the Court yesterday “extended an order that will keep the results of a Hawaii election from being known or approved while a court test of the balloting rules goes on.”  Jess Bravin also covered the order for The Wall Street Journal, with commentary from Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog.

Next week the Court will hear oral arguments in Evenwel v. Abbott, the “one person, one vote” challenge to the state legislative maps in Texas.  At The Heritage Foundation, Andrew Grossman contends that, if the Court is true to its precedents, it will act to enforce Sue Evenwel’s and Edward Pfenninger’s right to cast votes of the same weight as those of their fellow Texans. If it does not do that, its decision will mark a real break in the law of OPOV and, as a practical matter, could even spell the beginning of the end of the doctrine.”  At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen posts a recent telebriefing on the case, hosted by the Constitutional Accountability Center, in which he participated. 

Briefly:

Posted in: Round-up

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY