Last week Nebraska and Oklahoma asked the Justices to allow them to file a lawsuit seeking to block part of Colorado’s scheme for the legalization of marijuana. There is a series of posts at The Volokh Conspiracy discussing the case: Eugene Volokh has some “small observations” about the lawsuit; Jonathan Adler suggests that the suit “makes Oklahoma and Nebraska look like fair-weather federalists”; Randy Barnett contends that the lawsuit “seriously misreads the Supreme Court’s decision in Gonzales v. Raich”; Ilya Somin argues that, if Nebraska and Oklahoma were to prevail, they “will also have set a very dangerous precedent – one that conservatives are likely to rue in other areas”; and Eugene Volokh adds that, although he is “skeptical about the case,” he also believes that “”the contrary argument [is] worth noting.”
Briefly:
A friendly reminder: We rely on our readers to send us links for the round-up. If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, or op-ed relating to the Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com.
CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY