Wednesday round-up

In 2012, the Court held in M.B.Z. v. Clinton that the political question doctrine does not preclude courts from considering the constitutionality of a provision of the Foreign Relations Reauthorization Act which allows a U.S. citizen born in Jerusalem to ask to have his passport list “Israel” as his place of birth.  The Court remanded the case to the D.C. Circuit, and yesterday that court held that the law intrudes on the president’s power.  Lyle reports on the decision for this blog, while at The Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Kontorovich discusses the D.C. Circuit’s deference to the executive branch in this issue of foreign relations, adding that the issue of the passport served as “merely a vehicle to challenge a broader government policy.”

Briefly:

Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the American Association of Law Schools as an amicus in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin.

Posted in: Round-up

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY