Monday round-up

On Friday, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that President Obama’s recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board violated the Constitution. Because of the political consequences of this decision, as well as the split among the circuits that this decision creates, there is a strong possibility that this case will ultimately reach the Court. Lyle reports on the decision for this blog, and additional coverage discussing the likelihood of review by the Court comes from Tom Schoenberg of Bloomberg News (here and here), David Savage and Jim Puzzanghera of the Los Angeles Times, Melanie Trottman, Jess Bravin, and Michael Crittenden of The Wall Street Journal, David Jackson of USA Today, Brad Knickerbocker of The Christian Science Monitor, Rick Ungar of Forbes, Josh Gerstein of Politico, Emily Bazelon at Slate, Charlie Savage and Steven Greenhouse of The New York Times, Robert Barnes and Steven Mufson of The Washington Post, and Garrett Epps at The Atlantic.

Although the Court’s next oral arguments are several weeks away, the weekend’s clippings also feature continuing coverage of cases that are scheduled for argument later this Term.  At Reuters, Joan Biskupic reports on the efforts of the parties in Hollingsworth v. Perry, the challenge to California’s Proposition 8, to influence the Department of Justice, while at the Los Angeles Times, David Savage covers the arguments contained in the briefs defending DOMA and Proposition 8.  In The New York Times, the Room for Debate discusses Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, in which the Court will consider the interpretation of the Indian Child Welfare Act; finally, also at The New York Times, Dan Frosch discusses the case in the context of a shortage of Indian foster parents.

Briefly:

Posted in: Round-up

CLICK HERE FOR FULL VERSION OF THIS STORY