Kaiser Eagle Mountain, Inc. v. National Parks & Conservation Ass’n
Petition for certiorari denied on March 28, 2011| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10-548 | 9th Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2010 |
Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe & Russell, P.C. serves as counsel to the petitioners in the following case, which is listed without regard to its likelihood of being granted.
Issue: Does a court err by vacating an agency’s action and remanding for further administrative proceedings that will have no effect on the agency’s decision or serve any other substantive purpose?
SCOTUSblog Coverage
Briefs and Documents
Certiorari-stage documents
- Opinion below (9th Circuit)
- Petition for certiorari
- Brief for the United States in opposition
- Brief of National Parks Conservation Association in opposition
- Brief for respondents Donna Charpied et al. in opposition
- Petitioners' reply
- Amicus brief of Judge Craig Manson et al.
- Amicus brief of the Pacific Legal Foundation
- Amicus brief of New Kaiser Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association
- Amicus brief of the Coachella Valley Economic Partnership
Submit Event
