Afternoon round-up: Today’s grant in immigration case
This morning the Court granted review in United States v. Texas, in which it is considering a challenge to the Obama administration’s changes to deportation policy for undocumented immigrants. Lyle Denniston covered the grant for this blog, while Amy Howe covered the grant in “Plain English.”
Other early coverage of the grant comes from Eyder Peralta of NPR, Pete Williams of NBC News, Jordan Fabian of The Hill, Ariane de Vogue of CNN, Adam Liptak and Michael Shear of The New York Times, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Jess Bravin and Byron Tau of The Wall Street Journal, Robert Barnes and Juliet Eilperin of The Washington Post, David G. Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Sam Baker at National Journal, Mark Sherman of the Associated Press, Chris Geidner of Buzzfeed, Josh Gerstein of Politico, Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, Caroline May of Breitbart, and Mark Walsh at Education Week.
Early commentary comes from Ian Millhiser at ThinkProgress, Cristian Farias and Elise Foley for Huffington Post, Elizabeth Slattery atThe Daily Signal, Noah Feldman of Bloomberg View, Daniel Fisher of Forbes, Tina Nguyen of Vanity Fair, Jay Sekulow of the American Center for Law and Justice, ImmigrationProf Blog, Dara Lind of Vox, Christi Parsons and Joseph Tanfani for the Los Angeles Times, and Dan Roberts of The Guardian.
Recommended Citation: Molly Runkle, Afternoon round-up: Today’s grant in immigration case, SCOTUSblog (Jan. 19, 2016, 5:40 PM), http://www.scotusblog.com/2016/01/afternoon-round-up-todays-grant-in-immigration-case/