Breaking News
TODAY AT THE COURT

The court ruled in Culley v. Marshall and Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy.

LIVE

Announcement of opinions for Thursday, May 9

 at 9:21 a.m.

We were live as the court released opinions in two cases. 

  • In Culley v. Marshall the court holds that in civil forfeiture cases involving personal property, the due process clause requires a timely forfeiture hearing but does not require a separate preliminary hearing.
  • The court rules 6-3 in Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy. The majority writes that a timely infringement claim under the Copyright Act can recover damages for any infringement that occurred more than three years before the lawsuit was filed. “The Copyright Act,” the court holds, “entitles a copyright owner to recover damages for any timely claim.”

Click here for a list of FAQs about opinion announcements.

 

ARGUMENT ANALYSIS

Supreme Court appears likely to side with Trump on some presidential immunity

 at 5:35 p.m.

The majority of the court appeared skeptical of a lower federal court ruling that rejected former President Donald Trump’s claim that he is immune from criminal prosecution for acts that, he argues, he took in his official capacity as president. Trump’s trial in Washington, D.C., related to his involvement in the Jan. 6, 2021, attacks on the U.S. Capitol, remains on hold while the Supreme Court decides his case.

ARGUMENT ANALYSIS

Supreme Court divided over federal-state conflict on emergency abortion ban

 at 3:45 p.m.

It was not clear after arguments on Wednesday how the court will rule in a dispute over whether Idaho’s general ban on abortion overrides a federal law requiring hospitals that participate in Medicare to provide emergency stabilizing care. The court’s decision will have a particular impact in the six states that lack exemptions to abortion bans to protect the health of the mother. 

PETITIONS OF THE WEEK

Canadian formerly held at Guantanamo seeks to erase terrorism conviction

 at 11:08 a.m.

A weekly look at new and notable petitions seeking Supreme Court review. This week: A man held in Guantanamo after accepting a plea bargain that waived his right to appeal is now asking the justices to expunge his conviction because the law for which he was convicted was not on the books at the time of the deal. His petition is Khadr v. United States.

Advocates in Conversation