Under Texas law, only voters ages 65 and older may vote by mail without providing an excuse. The Texas Democratic Party and several voters went to federal court this spring to try to change that rule in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. U.S. District Judge Fred Biery issued a preliminary injunction in May that would allow all eligible voters to vote by mail without an excuse throughout the pandemic. Biery ruled that, because it treats older voters differently from younger voters, the Texas law likely violates the 26th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which bars states from discriminating against voters based on age.
Texas appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, which agreed to put Biery’s order on hold until the appeal was resolved. That led the challengers to go to the Supreme Court last June, asking the justices to reinstate Biery’s order and allow all eligible voters to vote by mail during the pandemic. The justices rejected that request in a brief order, without any noted dissents, on June 26. Justice Sonia Sotomayor added a short statement in which she explained that she did “not disagree with the decision to refrain from addressing” the “weighty but seemingly novel questions regarding the Twenty-Sixth Amendment” at this stage of the case, but she urged the 5th Circuit to “consider the merits of the legal issues in this case well in advance of the November election.”
A three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit issued a decision lifting Biery’s order on Sept. 10. The court of appeals concluded that the Texas law limiting no-excuse mail-in voting to older voters does not, standing alone, violate the 26th Amendment, and nothing about the pandemic changes that. “There are quite reasonable concerns about voting in person,” the court of appeals acknowledged, “but the state’s mandating that many voters continue to vote in that way does not amount to an absolute prohibition of the right to vote.” “The real issue here,” the court added, “is equal protection” – the idea that the government cannot treat one group less favorably than another – “and that is not before us.” The court of appeals sent the case back to the lower court for further proceedings, which will likely include consideration of issues like equal protection, although it is not clear yet whether the challengers will ask either the full 5th Circuit or the Supreme Court to weigh in first.
The deadline for Texas voters to request a mail-in ballot is Oct. 23.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders|
|April 7, 2020||Complaint filed by Texas Democratic Party, et al.|
|May 19, 2020||Preliminary injunction lifting age requirement for vote-by-mail issued by district court|
|June 4, 2020||Injunction stayed by 5th Circuit|
|June 16, 2020||Application filed in Supreme Court to lift 5th Circuit's stay of injunction|
|June 26, 2020||Application denied by full Supreme Court. Justice Sotomayor, concurring.|
|September 10, 2020||Opinion issued by 5th Circuit upholding age requirement and remanding to district court for further consideration|
|October 7, 2020||Opinion in related state case issued by Texas Supreme Court upholding age requirement|
Just in: The next Supreme Court opinion day will be next Monday. The court expects to release one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term.
End of an era: Here is NBC News prez Noah Oppenheim's memo about Pete Williams' plan to retire this summer
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/