Under Texas law, only voters ages 65 and older may vote by mail without providing an excuse. The Texas Democratic Party and several voters went to federal court this spring to try to change that rule in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. U.S. District Judge Fred Biery issued a preliminary injunction in May that would allow all eligible voters to vote by mail without an excuse throughout the pandemic. Biery ruled that, because it treats older voters differently from younger voters, the Texas law likely violates the 26th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which bars states from discriminating against voters based on age.
Texas appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, which agreed to put Biery’s order on hold until the appeal was resolved. That led the challengers to go to the Supreme Court last June, asking the justices to reinstate Biery’s order and allow all eligible voters to vote by mail during the pandemic. The justices rejected that request in a brief order, without any noted dissents, on June 26. Justice Sonia Sotomayor added a short statement in which she explained that she did “not disagree with the decision to refrain from addressing” the “weighty but seemingly novel questions regarding the Twenty-Sixth Amendment” at this stage of the case, but she urged the 5th Circuit to “consider the merits of the legal issues in this case well in advance of the November election.”
A three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit issued a decision lifting Biery’s order on Sept. 10. The court of appeals concluded that the Texas law limiting no-excuse mail-in voting to older voters does not, standing alone, violate the 26th Amendment, and nothing about the pandemic changes that. “There are quite reasonable concerns about voting in person,” the court of appeals acknowledged, “but the state’s mandating that many voters continue to vote in that way does not amount to an absolute prohibition of the right to vote.” “The real issue here,” the court added, “is equal protection” – the idea that the government cannot treat one group less favorably than another – “and that is not before us.” The court of appeals sent the case back to the lower court for further proceedings, which will likely include consideration of issues like equal protection, although it is not clear yet whether the challengers will ask either the full 5th Circuit or the Supreme Court to weigh in first.
The deadline for Texas voters to request a mail-in ballot is Oct. 23.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders|
|April 7, 2020||Complaint filed by Texas Democratic Party, et al.|
|May 19, 2020||Preliminary injunction lifting age requirement for vote-by-mail issued by district court|
|June 4, 2020||Injunction stayed by 5th Circuit|
|June 16, 2020||Application filed in Supreme Court to lift 5th Circuit's stay of injunction|
|June 26, 2020||Application denied by full Supreme Court. Justice Sotomayor, concurring.|
|September 10, 2020||Opinion issued by 5th Circuit upholding age requirement and remanding to district court for further consideration|
|October 7, 2020||Opinion in related state case issued by Texas Supreme Court upholding age requirement|
Incidentally, Gorsuch had been scheduled to give a speech at the University of Wyoming today, but his visit was canceled due to COVID.
Nothing from Kagan or Gorsuch though 😢 https://twitter.com/scotusblog/status/1438530948207874050
💥 Breyer continues book tour (including @colbertlateshow two nights ago).
💥 Barrett gave a speech Sunday @uofl.
💥 Thomas is slated to give the 2021 Tocqueville Lecture today @NotreDame (but, like Barrett's speech, there is apparently no livestream).
Can modern art shed new light on landmark Supreme Court rulings? A recent book says yes. Artist Xavier Cortada created 10 paintings depicting SCOTUS cases, and scholars used the paintings to re-examine each case's legacy. Here's @amanda_frost1's review:
The art of justice: Re-examining landmark Supreme Court cases through expressionist paintings - SCOTUSblog
Tired of reading jargon-filled law review articles with hundreds of footnotes? The perfect antidote is Painting Consti...
NEW: The Senate Judiciary Committee will hold a hearing tomorrow on Biden's nomination of Elizabeth Prelogar to be solicitor general, the federal government's top lawyer at the Supreme Court.
In separate remarks on Sunday, two justices argued that SCOTUS is not a political body.
Justice Barrett did so in a speech in Kentucky, after being introduced by Mitch McConnell:
Justice Breyer did so in an interview on Fox News: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-justice-stephen-breyer-political-reforms
Barrett concerned about public perception of Supreme Court
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (AP) — Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett expressed concerns Sunday that the public may incre...
SCOTUS provides instructions to the parties in the case of John Ramirez, the death-row inmate who has requested that his pastor be permitted to lay hands on him and pray out loud in the death chamber.
#SCOTUS issued a Friday-night order outlining specific questions for inmate John Ramirez & Texas to address in their briefing in his case, which is scheduled for argument in November. The Court put Ramirez's execution on hold earlier this week: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/091021zr_ap6c.pdf