Discussing civil litigation and the modern regulatory and statutory state
Clear Statements is a recurring series by Abbe R. Gluck on civil litigation and the modern regulatory and statutory state. Rumors of the textualist triumph over legislative history have been greatly exaggerated.
Clear Statements is a recurring series by Abbe R. Gluck on civil litigation and the modern regulatory and statutory state. The Supreme Court’s decision striking down the president’s tariffs last week is generating a lot of chatter in wonky circles about the inside-baseball debate among the justices about the “major questions” rule.
Clear Statements is a recurring series by Abbe R. Gluck on civil litigation and the modern regulatory and statutory state. Depending on who you ask, the real “bad old days” at the Supreme Court were the late 1970s.
Clear Statements is a recurring series by Abbe R. Gluck on civil litigation and the modern regulatory and statutory state. Verbs, verbs, verbs. Court-watchers hoping for fireworks over the reach of presidential authority in the tariff cases argued at the Supreme Court on Wednesday might have been left a little disappointed.
Clear Statements is a recurring series by Abbe R. Gluck on civil litigation and the modern regulatory and statutory state. As most SCOTUSblog readers know, just over a year ago, the court decided Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, overruling what had been among the most cited cases in the U.S. Reports: Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council.