Wilkinson v. Garland
Holding
The Immigration Judge's discretionary decision that Situ Kamu Wilkinson failed to satisfy 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1)(D)'s "exceptional and extremely unusual hardship" standard for determining eligibility for cancellation of removal is a mixed question of law and fact, reviewable under Section 1252(a)(2)(D)'s jurisdiction restoring exception for "questions of law"; the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit's holding that the IJ's decision was unreviewable under Section 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) was in error.
Judgment
Reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded, 6-3, in an opinion by Sonia Sotomayor on Mar 19, 2024. Justice Jackson filed an opinion concurring in the judgment. Chief Justice Roberts filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion in which Roberts and Justice Thomas joined.
Recommended Citation: Wilkinson v. Garland, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/wilkinson-v-garland/