Skip to main content

United States v. Palestine Liberation Organization

Docket No.24-151
Op. Below2nd Cir.
ArgumentApr 1, 2025

Holding

The Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act’s personal jurisdiction provision does not violate the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause because the statute reasonably ties the assertion of jurisdiction over the Palestine Liberation Organization and Palestinian Authority to conduct involving the United States and implicating sensitive foreign policy matters within the prerogative of the political branches.

Judgment

Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by John Roberts on Jun 20, 2025. Justice Thomas filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, which Justice Gorsuch joined as to Part II.

Proceedings & orders timeline

Aug 8, 2024
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 11, 2024)
Aug 23, 2024
Brief of respondents Miriam Fuld, et al. in support filed.
Aug 27, 2024
Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 11, 2024 to October 18, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
Aug 28, 2024
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 18, 2024.
Oct 18, 2024
Brief of respondents Palestine Liberation Organization, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED.
Nov 6, 2024
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
Nov 6, 2024
Reply of petitioner United States filed. (Distributed)
Dec 2, 2024
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
Dec 6, 2024
Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 24-20 is granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. VIDED.
Dec 6, 2024
Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 24-20. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 24-20. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED."
Feb 10, 2025
SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, April 1, 2025. VIDED.
Feb 13, 2025
Record requested from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Feb 13, 2025
Record received electronically from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and available with the Clerk.
Feb 19, 2025
CIRCULATED
Feb 28, 2025
Brief of respondents Palestinian Authority and Palestine Liberation Organization filed. VIDED. (Distributed)
Apr 1, 2025
Argued. For petitioners in 24-20: Kent A. Yalowitz, New York, N. Y. For petitioner in 24-151: Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Mitchell R. Berger, Washington, D. C. VIDED.
Jun 20, 2025
Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan, Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Jackson, JJ., joined. Thomas, J., filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, which Gorsuch, J., joined as to Part II. VIDED.
Jul 22, 2025
Judgment Issued.

Welcome to SCOTUSblog

Tell us a bit about yourself so we can tailor what you see. You can update these any time in your account.