United States v. Kebodeaux
Holding
As applied to respondent Anthony Kebodeaux, the registration requirements of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act fall within the scope of Congress"s authority under the Necessary and Proper Clause.
Judgment
Reversed, 7-2, in an opinion by Stephen G. Breyer on Jun 24, 2013. Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito filed opinions concurring in the judgment. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Scalia joined as to parts I, II, and III-B.
Holding: As applied to respondent Anthony Kebodeaux, the registration requirements of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act fall within the scope of Congress”s authority under the Necessary and Proper Clause.
Judgment:”Reversed, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on June 24, 2013. Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito filed opinions concurring in the judgment. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Thomas filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Scalia joined as to parts I, II, and III-B.
Recommended Citation: United States v. Kebodeaux, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/united-states-v-kebodeaux/