United States v. Eurodif
Judgment
Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by David H. Souter on Jan 26, 2009.
Merit briefs
- Brief for Petitioners USEC, Inc., and the United States Enrichment Corporation (in 07-1078 only)
- Brief of Petitioner United States of America
- Brief of Respondent Eurodif S.A., et al.
- Brief of Respondent Ad Hoc Utilities Group
- Reply Brief for Petitioner USEC, Inc. and the United States Enrichment Corporation(in 07-1078 only)
- Reply Brief for Petitioner United States of America(in 07-1059 only)
Amicus briefs
- Brief for the Committee to Support U.S. Trade Laws in Support of Petitioner
- Brief for Alcoa, Inc., in Support of Respondent
- Brief for the National Atomic Company Kazatomprom in Support of Respondent
- Brief for Professor Raj Bhala in Support of Respondent
- Brief for Techsnabexport in Support of Respondent
[##CERT-STAGE##]
Recommended Citation: United States v. Eurodif, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/united-states-v-eurodif/