Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Gregg
Petition for a writ of certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana.
Docket No.21-453
Op. BelowCal. Ct. App.
Issue
Whether agreements calling for individual arbitration are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act with respect to claims asserted under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act.
Sep 21, 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 25, 2021)Oct 25, 2021Brief amicus curiae of the Retail Litigation Center, Inc. filed.
Nov 9, 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
Nov 10, 2021Response Requested. (Due December 10, 2021)
Dec 3, 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 10, 2021 to January 10, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.Dec 6, 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 10, 2022.
Jan 10, 2022Response to petition from respondent Johnathon Gregg filed.Jan 12, 2022Letter from petitioners dated January 12, 2022 filed in reply to the response to the petition for certiorari.Jan 26, 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
Jun 21, 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.
Jun 27, 2022Petition GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, 596 U. S. ___ (2022).
Jul 29, 2022JUDGMENT ISSUED
Recommended Citation: Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Gregg, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/uber-technologies-inc-v-gregg/