Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Gregg
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on June 17, 2024.
Docket No.23-645
Op. BelowCal. Ct. App.
Issue
Whether the Federal Arbitration Act requires the complete severance of arbitrable individual claims under the California Private Attorneys General Act from non-individual claims, with the individual claims committed to a separate proceeding.
Dec 12, 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 16, 2024)Dec 21, 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 16, 2024 to February 15, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
Dec 22, 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 15, 2024.
Jan 15, 2024Brief amicus curiae of Civil Justice Association of California filed.Jan 16, 2024Brief amicus curiae of California Business & Industrial Alliance filed.Jan 16, 2024Brief amicus curiae of Employers Group filed.Jan 16, 2024Brief amicus curiae of Restaurant Law Center filed.Feb 14, 2024Brief of respondent Johnathon Gregg in opposition filed.Feb 27, 2024Reply of petitioners Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)Feb 28, 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/15/2024.
Mar 12, 2024Rescheduled.
May 28, 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2024.
Jun 17, 2024Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Gregg, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/uber-technologies-inc-v-gregg-2/