Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Drammeh
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on October 6, 2025.
Issue
Whether, under Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, a federal court must apply existing state law or can instead predict changes in state law.
Jan 10, 2025Application (24A690) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 22, 2025 to March 21, 2025, submitted to Justice Kagan.Jan 14, 2025Response to application from respondent Amie Drammeh, Yusepha Ceesay, and Maram Ceesay filed.
Jan 15, 2025Application (24A690) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until March 21, 2025.
Mar 21, 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 24, 2025)Apr 3, 2025Waiver of right of respondents Amie Drammeh, et al to respond filed.Apr 3, 2025Waiver of right of respondent Jane Doe to respond filed.Apr 9, 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/25/2025.
Apr 14, 2025Response Requested. (Due May 14, 2025)
Apr 23, 2025Motion of respondent Jane Doe to extend the time to file a response from May 14, 2025 to June 13, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.Apr 23, 2025Motion of respondents Amie Drammeh, et al. to extend the time to file a response from May 14, 2025 to June 13, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.Apr 25, 2025The Motions to extend the time to file responses are granted and the time is extended to and including June 13, 2025, for all respondents.
May 14, 2025Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.Jun 13, 2025Brief of respondent Jane Doe in opposition filed.Jun 13, 2025Brief of respondents Amie Drammeh, et al. in opposition filed.Jul 2, 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
Jul 2, 2025Reply of petitioners Uber Technologies, Inc., et al. filed. (Distributed)Oct 6, 2025Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Drammeh, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/uber-technologies-inc-v-draameh/