U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen
Holding
In an action brought under Section 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, which authorizes a civil action "to obtain . . . appropriate equitable relief . . . to enforce . . . the terms of the" ERISA plan, based on an equitable lien by agreement, the terms of the ERISA plan govern. However, when there are gaps in the plan, equitable doctrines may be used to properly construe it.
Judgment
Vacated and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Elena Kagan on Apr 16, 2013. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito joined.
Holding: In an action brought under Section 502(a)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, which authorizes a civil action “to obtain . . . appropriate equitable relief . . . to enforce . . . the terms of the” ERISA plan, based on an equitable lien by agreement, the terms of the ERISA plan govern. However, when there are gaps in the plan, equitable doctrines may be used to properly construe it.
Judgment:”Vacated and remanded“on April 16, 2013. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito joined.
Recommended Citation: U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/u-s-airways-inc-v-mccutchen/