Tun-Cos v. Perrotte
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on March 30, 2020.
Issue
Whether victims of an unconstitutional search and seizure, who were subjected to a home raid and detention without a warrant or suspicion by law enforcement agents of Immigration and Customs Enforcement acting in contravention of both agency policy and clearly established constitutional rights, may bring a civil action against those rogue agents under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics.
Nov 20, 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 23, 2019)Dec 17, 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 23, 2019 to January 22, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Dec 18, 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 22, 2020.
Jan 9, 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 22, 2020 to February 21, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.Jan 10, 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 21, 2020.
Feb 21, 2020Brief of respondents B. Perrotte, et al. in opposition filed.Mar 10, 2020Reply of petitioners Mynor Abdiel Tun-Cos, et al. filed. (Distributed)Mar 11, 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/27/2020.
Mar 30, 2020Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Tun-Cos v. Perrotte, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/tun-cos-v-perrotte/