Trump v. New York
Emergency application for stay is denied on Jan. 9, 2025. Justices Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh would grant the application.
Docket No.24A666
Jan 8, 2025Application (24A666) for a stay, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Jan 8, 2025Response to application (24A666) requested by Justice Sotomayor, due by 10 a.m. (EST), on January 9, 2025.
Jan 9, 2025Brief amici curiae of Former Attorney General Edwin Meese III, et al. filed.Jan 9, 2025Amicus brief of Former Public Officials and Legal Scholars not accepted for filing. (Printed copies not received by Clerk. See Rule 37.4.)
Jan 9, 2025Response to application from respondent New York, et al. filed.Jan 9, 2025Reply of applicant Donald J. Trump filed.Jan 9, 2025Application (24A666) referred to the Court.
Jan 9, 2025Application (24A666) for stay presented to Justice Sotomayor and by her referred to the Court is denied for, inter alia, the following reasons. First, the alleged evidentiary violations at President-Elect Trump’s state-court trial can be addressed in the ordinary course on appeal. Second, the burden that sentencing will impose on the President-Elect’s responsibilities is relatively insubstantial in light of the trial court’s stated intent to impose a sentence of “unconditional discharge” after a brief virtual hearing.
Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, Justice Gorsuch, and Justice Kavanaugh would grant the application.
Recommended Citation: Trump v. New York, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/trump-v-new-york-2/