Skip to main content

Trump v. J.G.G.

Application to vacate order is granted on April 7, 2025. Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, Barrett, and Jackson dissenting.

Docket No.24A931
Vote5-4
FiledMar 28, 2025

Proceedings & orders timeline

Mar 28, 2025
Application (24A931) to vacate the orders issued by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Mar 28, 2025
Response to application (24A931) requested by The Chief Justice, due by 10 a.m. (EDT), on April 1, 2025.
Mar 31, 2025
Amicus brief of American Rights Alliance not accepted for filing. (To be corrected and resubmitted - April 1, 2025)
Mar 31, 2025
Brief amicus curiae of APA Watch filed.
Mar 31, 2025
Brief amicus curiae of South Carolina, et al. filed.
Apr 1, 2025
Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Appellants-Defendants by the American Rights Alliance not accepted for filing. (April 1, 2025)
Apr 1, 2025
Response to application from respondents J.G.G., et al. filed.
Apr 1, 2025
Amicus brief of Representative Brandon Gill not accepted for filing. (April 01, 2025) (corrected brief to be submitted)
Apr 1, 2025
Brief amicus curiae of American Rights Alliance filed.
Apr 1, 2025
Brief amicus curiae of Democracy Defenders Fund and Conservatives filed.
Apr 1, 2025
Brief amicus curiae of Representative Brandon Gill filed.
Apr 2, 2025
Reply of applicants Donald J. Trump, et al. filed.
Apr 7, 2025
Application (24A931) referred to the Court.
Apr 7, 2025
Application (24A931) to vacate the orders of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia presented to The Chief Justice and by him referred to the Court is granted. The March 15, 2025 minute orders granting a temporary restraining order and March 28, 2025 extension of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, case No. 1:25-cv-766, are vacated. Justice Kavanaugh concurring (Detached Opinion). Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Kagan and Justice Jackson join, and with whom Justice Barrett joins as to Parts II and III-B dissenting (Detached Opinion), and Justice Jackson dissenting. (Detached Opinion). Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)

Welcome to SCOTUSblog

Tell us a bit about yourself so we can tailor what you see. You can update these any time in your account.