Trevino v. Thaler
Holding
When, as here, a state"s procedural framework, by reason of its design and operation, makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise on direct appeal a claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, the good cause exception recognized in Martinez v. Ryan applies.
Judgment
Vacated and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Stephen G. Breyer on May 28, 2013. The Chief Justice filed a dissenting opinion in which Justice Alito joined. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion in which Justice Thomas joined.
Holding: When, as here, a state”s procedural framework, by reason of its design and operation, makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise on direct appeal a claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, the good cause exception recognized in”Martinez v. Ryan“applies.
Judgment:”Vacated and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on May 28, 2013. The Chief Justice filed a dissenting opinion in which Justice Alito joined. Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion in which Justice Thomas joined.
Recommended Citation: Trevino v. Thaler, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/trevino-v-thaler/