Treppa v. Hengle
Linked with Asner v. Hengle (21-1132)
Petition dismissed pursuant to Rule 46 on May 18, 2022
Issue
(1) Whether a court can invalidate an agreement to have an arbitrator resolve questions of arbitrability (a "delegation clause") based on the court"s interpretation of a separate choice-of-law provision; and (2) whether sovereign immunity bars private plaintiffs from suing tribal government officials, in their official capacities, for alleged violations of state law.
Dec 14, 2021Application (21A237) for a stay pending the filing and distribution of a petition for a writ of certiorari, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Dec 17, 2021Response to application (21A237) requested by The Chief Justice, due by noon on Thursday, December 30, 2021.
Dec 30, 2021Response to application from respondent George Hengle, et al. filed.Jan 3, 2022Reply of applicants Sherry Treppa, et al. filed.Jan 10, 2022Application (21A237) referred to the Court.
Jan 10, 2022Application (21A237) denied by the Court.
Feb 14, 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 18, 2022)Mar 3, 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 18, 2022 to April 18, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.Mar 4, 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 18, 2022.
Apr 8, 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 18, 2022 to May 18, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.Apr 11, 2022Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 18, 2022.
May 16, 2022Joint stipulation to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46 filed.May 18, 2022Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
Recommended Citation: Treppa v. Hengle, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/treppa-v-hengle/