Freeman v. Quicken Loans Inc. (10-1042)

Freeman v. Quicken Loans Inc.

Holding

To establish a violation of 12 U.S.C. § 2607(b) " which provides that "[n]o person shall give and no person shall accept any portion, split, or percentage of any charge made or received for the rendering of a real estate settlement service . . . other than for services actually performed" " a plaintiff must demonstrate that a charge for settlement services was divided between two or more persons.

Judgment

Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Antonin Scalia on May 24, 2012.

Merits Briefs for the Petitioners

Brief for Tammy Freeman et al.
Reply for Tammy Freeman et al.

Amicus Briefs in Support of Petitioners

Brief for the United States
Brief for California et al.

Merits Briefs for the Respondent

Brief for Quicken Loans Inc.

Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondent

Brief for the American Bankers Association et al.
Brief for the American Escrow Association et al.
Brief for National Association of Realtors

[##CERT-STAGE##]

Recommended Citation: Freeman v. Quicken Loans Inc., SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/tammy-foret-freeman-et-al-v-quicken-loans-inc-2/