Southern California Edison Company v. Nevada Department of Taxation
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on January 16, 2018.
Issue
Whether proof that a tax scheme violates the dormant commerce clause by favoring in-state interests over out-of-state interests, and thereby advantages some competitors over others within the same market, is sufficient to entitle the disfavored competitors to a remedy.
Oct 6, 2017Application (17A385) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 25, 2017 to November 21, 2017, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Oct 10, 2017Application (17A385) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until November 21, 2017.
Nov 21, 2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 21, 2017)Dec 14, 2017Waiver of right of respondent State of Nevada Department of Taxation to respond filed.Dec 27, 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/12/2018.
Jan 16, 2018Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: Southern California Edison Company v. Nevada Department of Taxation, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/southern-california-edison-company-v-nevada-department-taxation/