SAP SE v. Teradata Corporation
Certiorari Denied
Petition for certiorari denied on October 6, 2025.
Issue
(1) Whether the rule of reason properly governs tying claims under Section 1 of the Sherman Act concerning software products that are technologically integrated—including when, as here, the tied product is sold separately from the tying product; and (2) whether the court’s precedents applying a per se rule to analyze the lawfulness of tying arrangements under Section 1 should be overruled.
Jun 2, 2025Motion (24M98) of petitioners for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari with the supplemental appendix under seal filed.
Jun 2, 2025Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 30, 2025)Jun 10, 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/26/2025.
Jun 30, 2025Motion (24M98) Granted.
Jun 30, 2025Waiver of right of respondent Teradata Corporation, et al. to respond filed.Jul 2, 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
Jul 9, 2025Letter of July 7, 2025 from counsel for petitioners recevied.Jul 11, 2025Response Requested. (Due August 11, 2025)
Jul 15, 2025Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 11, 2025 to August 25, 2025, submitted to The Clerk.Jul 16, 2025Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 25, 2025.
Aug 11, 2025Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.Aug 11, 2025Brief amici curiae of Microsoft Corporation, et al. filed.Aug 25, 2025Brief of respondents Teradata Corporation, et al. in opposition filed.Sep 10, 2025DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2025.
Sep 10, 2025Reply of petitioners SAP SE, et al. filed. (Distributed)Oct 6, 2025Petition DENIED.
Recommended Citation: SAP SE v. Teradata Corporation, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/sap-se-v-teradata-corporation/