Reichle v. Howards
Holding
The petitioners " two Secret Service agents -- are entitled to qualified immunity from suit involving a claim that they arrested the respondent in retaliation for remarks he had made about then-Vice President Cheney because, at the time of the arrest, it was not clearly established that an arrest supported by probable cause could give rise to a First Amendment violation.
Merits Briefs for the Petitioners
Amicus Briefs in Support of the Petitioners
- Brief for the United States
- Brief for the International City/County Management Association”
- Brief for FBI Agents Association and the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association
Merits Briefs for the Respondent
Amicus Briefs in Support of the Respondent
Amicus Briefs in Support of Neither Party
[##CERT-STAGE##]
Recommended Citation: Reichle v. Howards, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/reichle-v-howards/