RBS Citizens, N.A. v. Ross

(1) Whether it is consistent with Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes to hold that a defendant to a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) class action has no right to raise statutory af?rmative defenses on an individual basis if the classseeks "only" monetary relief; and (2) whether a district court can conclude that the Rule 23(a)(2) commonality requirement is satis?ed when a class claims the denial of overtime pay, without resolving whether dissimilarities in the class would preclude it from establishing liability on a class-wide basis.