Perdomo v. United States
Petition granted, judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of Sessions v. Dimaya on May 14, 2018.
Issue
Whether 18 U.S.C. § 16(b) is unconstitutionally vague because it requires application of an indeterminate risk standard to the "ordinary case" of an individual"s prior conviction.
Dec 13, 2016Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due January 17, 2017)Jan 10, 2017Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
Jan 26, 2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 17, 2017.
Apr 17, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/20/2018.
Apr 23, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018.
May 7, 2018DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/10/2018.
May 14, 2018Motion to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED. Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Sessions v. Dimaya, 584 U. S. ____ (2018).
Jun 15, 2018JUDGMENT ISSUED.
Recommended Citation: Perdomo v. United States, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/perdomo-v-united-states/